|
The Moral and Social Influence of Devotion to Mary by Orestes A. Brownson It was said by the late lamented Father Baker, in one of his sermons, that "the blessed virgin Mary was greater in that she heard and kept the word of God than in being the mother of God" This seems to be justified by what our Lord himself says to the woman in the crowd, who exclaimed: "Blessed is the womb that bore thee, and the paps that gave thee suck." "Yea rather," he answers, "blessed are they who hear the word of God and keep it;" and also in reply to the one who told him his mother and his brethren stood without seeking him: "Who is my mother, and who are my brethren?" And stretching forth his hand toward his disciples, he said: "Behold my mother and my brethren. For whosoever doeth the will of my Father who is in heaven, he is my brother, and sister, and mother." He thus implies that doing the will of God is more than the closest ties of kindred. The distinction of being the mother of God was great, and for that all nations were to call Mary blessed; but she was more blessed in always doing the will of God, or in the possession of those virtues which led to her selection to be the mother of God. Her personal merit in always hearing and keeping the word of God was greater than in giving her consent to be his mother; and even the great merit of that consent was in its being given in perfect submission to the will of God: "Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it done unto me according to thy word." As much as to say:" I am the servant of the Lord; his will is mine."
None but Mary alone can ever bear the honor of being the mother of
God. That is hers alone, and forever distinguishes her among all
women; but her virtues, those for which God chose her among all
women to be his mother, are such as all, whether men or women, may
in some degree possess in common with her. None can equal them,
for she was
I have insisted on this view, because the fact that Mary's virtues
are the virtues of our own race is a reason why the devotion to
her which we Catholics practice has exerted, exerts, and is fitted
to exert a most salutary influence on individuals and nations, and
on the manners and morals of society at large. Mary's own
influence is included in that of her Son, inseparable from it, and
nothing would grieve her more than an attempt to separate or even
to distinguish it from his, as if she could or would be anything
without him. Her great merit is in willing only what he wills, and
in doing only what he inspires and enables her to do. What she
does in relation to our salvation or our progress or perseverance
in grace is only what he does by her. It is really he who does it,
and in crowning her, he crowns his own work. He makes her the
channel or medium of his grace and favors to men because he loves
and delights to honor her by granting them at her request, but it
is he who grants them. She is all powerful with him, and he will
deny her nothing she asks for, because she asks only for that
which accords with his will, and which he is more ready and
willing to grant than even she is to ask. With all the love and
tenderness of her woman's nature, and of her mother's heart, she
cannot love us so much or so tenderly as he does. A woman may
forget her sucking child, but he cannot forget us. He delights to
grant her requests for her clients, because she makes no requests
which he does not inspire, and because to grant these favors at
her request honors her, and gives her a share in his glory. How
much the world is indebted to her intercession with him, we know
not, cannot know, and need not to know. Be it more or be it less,
it is to him the world owes it, for it is he who filled her with
grace and made her the most blessed of creatures, and it is he who
inspires and listens to her intercessions, and her work is as
indistinguishable from his as is the work of the church herself.
But the fact that the influence of the mother is not
distinguishable from that of the Son, does not prevent us from
distinguishing the influence on individuals and society of the
special devotion we Catholics pay to our Lady, as a part of
Christian worship in general. This influence cannot indeed be
separated from the general influence of Christian faith and
worship, but it may to a certain extent be distinguished, and
considered by itself. It leaves everywhere distinct marks of
itself, and modern civilization owes to it many of its
characteristic features, and much of its immense superiority to
that of Greek and Roman antiquity.
The worshipper of God loves, adores, praises, thanks, believes,
trusts him, offers himself as a holocaust to him, implores mercy
and pardon, gracious protection and help; the worshipper of the
saints honors their worth, their holiness, and seeks, as the
highest honor he can do them, and as the greatest favor they can
do to him, to possess virtues akin to their own, and by constant
meditation on them, their life and character, loving, admiring,
venerating, and striving to imitate them, he can hardly fail to
acquire kindred virtues, because their virtues are those of
creatures like himself, and therefore by the grace of God-never
withheld from those that seek it-within his reach. In this respect
as being wholly human the saints are nearer to us than is our Lord
himself, and we can more easily approach them. True, our Lord is
"perfect man," but he is also "perfect God," the divine and human,
though forever distinct, inseparably united in one divine person,
and from what he could do, we cannot infer what we can do. If he
is like unto us he is also above and beyond us, and his ability is
no measure of ours. But the saints, even holy Mary, the chiefest
of them all, are wholly of our race, are wholly human, and their
virtues, the grace of God assisting, are not above our imitation.
If we cannot equal we can approach their sanctity and worth.
On the principle here asserted, the worship,-to use the proper
English word,-the worship of Mary, or the devotion which the
faithful render her, must have a direct and powerful tendency to
promote in her clients the virtues which they love, honor, and
venerate in her. The devotion to Mary is not that Teutonic worship
of woman as a goddess to which this age, where the Catholic faith
and worship do not predominate, is strongly addicted, to the great
detriment of manliness, and of manners and morale; nor is it
precisely devotion to her rank, or dignity as queen-mother,
especially with us sturdy republicans, who honor kings and queens
only as symbols of just and legitimate authority; but it is the
worship of the highest and purest virtues embodied in a real
person, living an] acting. The virtues of our Lady are not only
each perfect in its kind, but they include every Christian virtue,
grace, and perfection. Mary and the church are often taken as
types, so to speak, of each other. Each presents in her living
character, all the virtues, all the graces and perfections honored
and rewarded by our Lord. But we cannot speak of them all, for it
would require a volume to speak worthily of any one of them. We
shall confine ourselves to the three principal virtues or
perfections which were most wanting in heathen society, and which
are most characteristic of Christendom, namely: humility,
maternity, and virginity or chastity. Of these Mary is the perfect
type.
1. Humility. The masters of spiritual life tell us that humility
is not only a virtue, but the root of all the virtues, without
which there is and can be no real virtue. Humility is not
servility, meanness of spirit, but is real greatness of soul, and
the basis of all generosity and disinterestedness. Pride, the vice
opposed to humility, has no magnanimity, no generosity,-is always
cold, narrow, selfish, cruel. Yet pride was the most prominent
characteristic of the ancient Graeco-Roman civilization. The whole
philosophical and moral system of the Stoics, the least
discreditable of the ancient sects, vas founded on pride. The
Stoic taught as distinctly self-denial, detachment from the world,
contempt of riches and honors, and superiority to all the
accidents of fortune, as does the Christian, but from pride,
because a man should have too high an opinion of himself to suffer
such trifles to afflict him. He scorns to feel, to suffer, because
he holds himself too superior to the world and its accidents, and
will not admit that any thing has power to affect or move him
against his own will. Very different is the Christian. The
Christian rises above the world by his humility, not his pride,
and proves his superiority to the world, to fortune, and overcomes
it by proving that his capacity to suffer pain, disgrace,
degradation even, is stronger than its power to inflict them. He
overcomes all the evils and mishaps of life, not by regarding them
as trifles to be despised, but by regarding them as the loving
chastisements of his heavenly Father, and by making them a means
of spiritual progress. The Christian observes the moral law, not
as the Stoic professes to do, from a contempt for the weakness
that would violate it, but from love of the law itself, and a
profound sense of its sacredness, and the justice and love of its
Author. The Stoic contemns death, and flies to it as a relief from
defeat and disgrace; the Christian meets death, when it comes,
with composure, not only knowing that to him it is the entrance
into a blissful eternity, but he has the true courage that can
bear disgrace, and defeat, and survive the loss of all the world
holds dear. The Stoic seeks always to assert his own superiority
to fortune, but finds his strength fail, and himself compelled not
unfrequently to seek death by his own hand; the Christian feels
and confesses his weakness, and seeks strength in one greater than
himself, who is ready to help and mighty to succor those who cast
their burdens on him. The Stoic fails in his strength, the
Christian triumphs in his weakness, or by relying on a strength
greater than his own. The Stoic isolates himself from humanity,
and has nothing to work with or for him; the Christian unites
himself by love with humanity and humanity's Maker and Redeemer,
and has with him and for him all that is great, mighty, and good
in heaven and earth, and is invincible in his love, all powerful
in his humility, and triumphant in all he undertakes.
Now the history of the human race presents us no example of
humility so striking, so perfect, so lovely as that of the Blessed
Virgin. Lowliest of Jewish maidens, though exalted to the dignity
of bride of Heaven and mother of God, not a thought or a movement
of pride or vain glory ever as sails her. She magnifies not
herself, but in the joy of her humility exclaims: "My soul doth
magnify the ford, and my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour,
because he hath regarded the humility of his handmaid, for behold
from henceforth all nations shall call me blessed; for he that is
mighty hath done great things to me, and holy is his name." Not a
word in glory of herself; her whole soul is filled with the
greatness and goodness of God, whom she gives all the glory of the
great things done to her. Who can say how much the study and
meditation of her example, of her perfect humility, to which the
honors paid her by the faithful constantly lead, have done to
destroy that pagan pride, and to change the pagan idolatry of self
into the worship of the living God and to promote that meekness
and sweetness of temper, that respect for the poor and lowly, and
that tenderness and compassion, so different from any thing we
find in the heathen world, and so characteristic of Christian
nations? How greatly has her example helped to realize the truth
of what she continues to chant!" He that is mighty hath done great
things to me, and holy is his name. And his mercy is from
generation to generations, to them that fear him. He hath showed
might in his arm; he hath scattered the proud in the conceit of
their heart. He hath put down the mighty from their seat, and hath
exalted the humble. He hath filled the hungry with good things,
and the rich he hath sent empty away."
The whole order of Christian civilization is founded on humility,
and on respect for the humble and compassion for the poor and
friendless, the needy and the helpless. The Greek and Roman
civilization was founded on pride, on respect for the successful,
and favored only the favorites of fortune. We find in those proud
republics before the coming of our Lord no respect for the poor,
no provision made for the needy, no sympathy for the slave. They
whom fortune favored not were regarded as cursed by the gods, whom
it would be impious to relieve or to compassionate. The Greeks
despised the poor and treated their slaves with gross inhumanity.
The Romans were no better. The God they worshipped was force. What
they honored was success, and no maxim did they more scrupulously
observe than the
2. In honoring Mary as the mother of God we honor maternity
elevated to its highest possible dignity. "Blessed is the womb
that bore thee, and blessed are the peps that gave thee suck."
"Yea, rather, blessed are they who hear the word of God and keep
it." Maternity is not all in bearing and nursing a child, nor is
that after all the highest and most blessed function of the
mother. It is not by a figure of speech only that we speak of
spiritual fathers and spiritual mothers. Spiritual paternity or
maternity is as real in the order of regeneration as is natural
paternity or maternity in the order of generation. The Jews
honored maternity, because they held that he who was to come was
to be born of woman, as we believe that he who was to come has
come and has been born of woman,-of her whom we honor as the
Blessed Virgin. The Jews honored as Christians honor maternity in
view of the Messiah, for they held the same faith that we do. But
among the heathen maternity can hardly be said to have been
honored at all, and the mother was prized only in proportion to
the number of children, especially of male children, she bore to
her lord. Nowhere in ancient or modern heathendom do we find
maternity regarded as a holy function, or any conception of its
deep spiritual significance Motherhood had hardly any rights of
its own, even with free mothers, and none at all with slave moth
It is mainly to the low estimate in which maternity is held among
the heathen that we must attribute in both ancient and modern
times the prevalence of child-murder, or the exposure of children,
as in China, India, and perhaps in all nations on which the light
of the Gospel sheds no ray. In ancient Sparta the law ordered all
malformed children to be put to death as soon as born, and in Rome
the mother had no rights over her new-born child, and the nurse
must wait the word of the father to know whether the babe just
born is to live or to be strangled. If the father refuses to own
it and to say let it live, it cannot be reared. The father can
slay the child with his own hand or with the hand of his slave
before the mother's eyes without her having any right to complain,
or the law any right to intervene. If the mother herself had any
proper respect for the sacredness and dignity of motherhood she
could never destroy her own offspring, and infanticide by the
hands of the mother or with her knowledge and consent would be an
unheard-of crime. If again, the father or society had any due
appreciation of the greatness and sacredness of motherhood, the
practice of child-murder could never be tolerated, or even
connived at. Not only did the low estimate in which maternity was
held, an estimate that placed it little above a mere animal
function lead to the toleration or authorization of child-murder,
but it tended to degrade womanhood, and to make woman herself a
mere accomplice with man in pleasure or ambition.
Under Christianity this estimate is corrected, and motherhood, as
a necessary consequence of elevating marriage to a sacrament, is
elevated in some sense to the spiritual order, and made a holy
function. Woman herself is elevated, ceases to be a mere drudge,
or an article of luxury. She is a person, not a chattel, has her
own personal existence, rights, and duties. If a wife, she is
indeed under obedience to her husband, but the obedience of a
person morally free, not the obedience of a slave. If the rights
of the father are paramount, they are not exclusive, and the
rights of the mother are recognized, and in some cases even
supersede those of the father. Under this Christian view of woman
and motherhood infanticide and the exposure of children ceased in
the nations that became, and just in proportion as they became and
remained Christian.
In general terms this change in regard to the estimate in which
maternity is held is of course due to Christianity, but it is more
particularly due to that element in Christian worship which we
call devotion to Mary, the virgin mother of God. In her motherhood
was invested with a significance, a sacredness, a dignity, an awe
even, never before conceived of as belonging to it. When God
himself condescends to be born of woman, and woman becomes the
mother of him who is the Creator of heaven and earth, and the
Redeemer and Saviour of mankind, motherhood becomes almost a
divine function, and something to be treated with reverence and
awe, for not only did Mary bring forth him who is Christ the Lord,
but every human mother brings forth a child destined, if true to
the law of his Maker, to be one with Christ, one with God, and a
real partaker of the divine nature. Satan lied in the sense he
intended to be understood, when, in tempting Eve, he said, "Ye
shall be as gods; "yet his promise was lees than the truth, below
the real destiny to which every human soul may aspire, for God
became man that man might become God, and the glorified saints
partake not only of the human nature assumed, but of the divine
nature itself,-are made, as Saint Peter says, divinae consortes
naturae.
Certainly I do not pretend that man ever becomes the Divinity or a
divine person. The glorified soul is still a creature, and
creature always will be; but it has all of the divine that is
communicable, and is joined to God by unity of nature as well as
by union of will and affection. The mystery of human destiny
through the Incarnation is too great for our comprehension; we
cannot conceive what will be the greatness and dignity of man when
glorified. "Beloved," says the Apostle John, "now are we the sons
of God, and it hath not yet appeared what we shall be; we know
that when he shall appear we shall be like to him, for we shall
see him as he is." (I John, iii, 2.)
Now in estimating the greatness and dignity of the mother we have
regard to the Son. All nations call Mary blessed, because he whom
she brought forth was the only begotten Son of God, and for a like
reason to that for which we honor maternity in her, should we
honor it, though of course in an inferior degree, in every human
mother. Every human mother may chant with Mary: "My soul cloth
magnify the Lord. * * * For he that is mighty hath done great
things to me, and holy is his name." It IB a great and sacred
thing to be the mother of a child, if we look to the destiny to
which every child may aspire. The mother who feels it, feels the
sacredness of her relation as mother, the high duty it imposes,
and studies diligently to train up her child in the fear of the
Lord, in sole reference to his lofty destiny. This estimate of her
own dignity and sacred function, reacts on the father, and compels
him to think seriously on his relation and solemn duties and
responsibilities as father, for more is exacted of him than even
of the mother.
Now, devotion to Mary, the honor we pay in her to motherhood,
brings all these great and solemn truths home to our winds, and
our hearts. We are led to reflect on the great mysteries of the
Incarnation, regeneration and glorification, and thence on the
awful dignity of motherhood, the sacredness and worth of every
child born of woman, and the obligation to reverence the mother,
to provide for the child's present and future welfare, and to
conform society itself, so far as may be, to the virtues honored
in the maternity of Mary. From this it is easy to see that
devotion to Mary has and must have a most salutary influence on
all domestic relations, and on the manners and morals, and
therefore on the progress of society itself.
3. We honor in Mary the virgin-mother; that is, purity or chastity
of mind and body, and in nothing in all history have the good
effects of the worship of Mary been more evident than in promoting
this great virtue. The elevation of motherhood, to which it leads,
carries necessarily along with it the elevation of womanhood, for
maternity is the special function of woman,-maternity, either in
the natural order or the spiritual order, as we learn from the
history of her creation. Just in proportion as maternity is
honored is womanhood honored, and just in proportion as womanhood
is honored are manners and morals elevated. Licentiousness cannot
obtain a foothold where the real dignity and sphere of woman is
understood and respected. It can prevail only where a low estimate
of woman obtains in society, and indeed only where woman
entertains a low estimate of herself in relation to the designs or
plans of divine Providence. Men, in general, estimate women very
much as they estimate themselves, or rather, estimate womanhood as
women estimate it, and if women regard womanhood as invested with
sacred and awful functions, they will be as averse to wronging her
as to the commission of the crime of sacrilege The maternity of
Mary has given sublime moral and spiritual significance to
womanhood, as the assumption of human nature by the Word has to
manhood itself. Under one aspect the virgin-mother,
The Jews honored, as we have seen, maternity, in view of the
Messiah who was to be born of woman, but they do not appear to
have honored virginity, and, as the Jewish dispensation was in the
order of generation, though symbolizing a higher order; they could
not; for virginity, in its spiritual sense, is in the order of the
regeneration, based on the principle of election by grace.
Marriage, with the Jews, was holy, for it is
But in passing from the Jewish to the gentile world chastity or
purity, in the a Christian sense of the word, and of which we find
the type in Mary, seems to have been wholly unknown or utterly
disregarded. It seems, at least, not to have been insisted on as a
virtue either in man or woman, and if conjugal fidelity was
enjoined, which was not always and everywhere, it seems to have
been enjoined less as a virtue than as an offering to the pride
and authority of the husband. It would be obviously out of place
here to attempt by the citation of facts to prove any assertions
of this sort. The facts are such as it would be a shame even to
name. My pen would blush to describe, and hardly dare allude to,
the improprieties of the cities of the plain, or to those which
the manners, customs, laws, and even religion tolerated, sometimes
enjoined, in Babylon, and in the luxurious cities of Syria and
Phenicia, and I must pass over in silence the Bacchic and Isiac
orgies, and the mysteries of the Bona Deal Voluptuousness was
worshipped as a goddess, through nearly all polished heathendom,
and nothing could exceed, if what grave historians have re corded
is to be believed, the licentiousness and corruption of manners
and morals in the very highest ranks of Roman society; and Rome
herself, the proud capital of the gentile world at the time when
the church was founded, was foul with the accumulated vices of all
ages and nations. The remains of her literature and art, the
pictures and sculptures of disinterred Eerculaneum and Pompeii,
bear but too ample evidence of the corruption of the Roman Empire.
No one can read the
Yet Christianity, wherever it was received, wrought changes in the
manners and morals of Roman society, so great, so pure, and so
holy, that they would alone suffice, if all other arguments were
wanting, to prove its divine origin, its divine truth, and its
supernatural energy. The Roman Empire was too rotten to be saved
as a state. Long the haughty mistress of the world, foul with the
vices, gorged with the spoils, and drunk with the blood of all
nations, she needed "the Scourge of God;" she needed to be
humbled, and Christianity itself could not avert, could hard]y
retard her downfall; yet it did much for private morals and
manners, breathed into the laws a spirit of justice and humanity
hitherto unknown, and in those very classes which, with a Julia
and a Messalina, had thrown off all shame, it trained up devout
worshippers of the virtues of Mary. That very Roman matronhood,
once so proud, then so abandoned, furnished, under the teachings
and inspirations of Christianity, some of the purest and noblest
heroines of the arose, who gave up all for Jesus, and won bravely
and joyously the glorious crown of martyrdom. Never has the church
of God had more disinterested, capable, and devoted servants than
she gained from the ranks of the Roman nobility in the city and
scattered through the provinces, and their names and relics are
held in high veneration throughout Christendom, and will forever
be honored wherever purity, sanctity, self-sacrifice, devotion,
and moral heroism are honored. Christianity freed and elevated the
brave, made him a man, a child of God, and heir of heaven, but
none served the church better, none did more to exemplify the
truths of the Gospel, and to aid in converting the empire, than
the Roman nobility, once so foul and corrupt. Christianity when
once she had converted the city to her own pure and living faith,
cleared it of its filth, and changed it from the capital of the
empire of Satan to the capital of Christ's kingdom on earth, which
it still is, and will be to the end of time. The conversion of
Rome from paganism to Christianity, the substitution of the
fisherman's ring for the seal, and the freedman's cap for the
diadem of the Caesars, is the grandest event in the history of the
church, and is a sure pledge of her final victory over
contemporary heresy, and both civilized and uncivilized
infidelity.
Devotion to Mary has had its part in effecting and sustaining this
marvelous change in manners and morals. Some Anglicans, indeed,
tell us that the worship of Mary was unknown at so early an age,
and that it is, in fact, a comparatively recent Roman innovation,
rather, a Roman corruption; but Anglicans themselves are of too
recent origin to be an authority on Christian antiquity. There are
obvious reasons why less should appear in the monuments of the
earliest ages, when the church was engaged in her life and death
struggle with the Greek and Roman idolatry, of that worship of
Mary, than in later times, when the victory was won, and the
danger from idolatry was less; but it does not follow that it was
less known or less generally observed. Many of the mysteries and
the more solemn parts of the divine service were placed, as is
well known under the discipline of the secret, lest they should be
profaned by the heathen, and there is no part of Christian worship
that the heathen would sooner or more grossly have profaned than
devotion to Mary. Their gross minds would have been as little able
to distinguish it from their own idolatrous worship, as are the
minds of our modern sectarians. But I have seen no reason to doubt
that devotion to Mary, the virgin-mother of God, was as well known
to the faithful, or that they were as fervent in its practice in
the earlier as in the later ages of the church. We see and hear
more of it as time goes on, perhaps because our information is
fuller; but there is no reason to conclude that there has been, in
fact, any increase of it, or any great development of it in later
times. It would be very difficult in any subsequent age to find or
make, even among modern Italians, supposed to be the warmest and
most enthusiastic worshippers of Mary, such demonstrations of
enthusiasm and joy as were exhibited all through the East, from
Ephesus to Alexandria, as the news spread that the Council of
Ephesus had declared Mary to be the mother of God, and condemned
Nestorius, who denied it. Nothing equal or similar occurred, not
even in Italy, when a few years since, the Holy Father defined the
Immaculate Conception to be of Catholic faith. The fair inference
is that the position of Mary was better understood, and devotion
to her was more lively in the earlier, than in the later period.
The fathers knew the faith and all that pertains to it, at least
as well as we do.
According to my reading of history, the epochs in which faith is
the strongest, piety the most robust, and the church wins her
grandest victories, whether in individuals or in nations, are
precisely those in which devotion to our Lady, or the worship of
her virtue, is the most diffused, the most vigorous and
flourishing; and the epochs in which faith seems to be obscured,
and to grow weak and sickly, and the church is the most harassed
and suffers her greatest losses, are precisely the epochs in which
this devotion is the most languid and feeble. All the great saints
have been no less remarkable for their tender and assiduous
devotion to Mary than for their manly virtues and heroic sanctity,
and I suspect that most of us could bear witness, if we would,
that the least unsatisfactory portions of our own lives have been
precisely those in which we were the most diligent and fervent in
our devotion to the mother of God. I claim, then, for devotion to
our Lady a full share of influence in rendering Christian society
so much superior in all the virtues to the polished but corrupt
society of pagan Greece and Rome. As with the pagans the worship
of the impure gods of their mythologies could not fail to corrupt
the worshippers, so with Christians the worship of the purity and
sanctity of the mother of God has not failed to purify and render
holy those who in sincerity, earnestness, and simplicity of heart
were careful to practice it.
I might tale up other virtues of Mary, for she is a Casket of
Jewels, and show in like manner how through devotion to Mary they
have entered into Christian society and formed its manners and
morals; but this every reader can easily do for himself. I have
laid down and illustrated the principle, and though I have said
not all, rather the least that could be said, I have said enough
to show that the influence of this devotion hag been and must have
been great and salutary on individual and domestic manners and
morals, and in elevating and advancing general society.
But I should be wanting to my own faith, and do far less honor to
our Lady than I would, if I stopped here, and limited the effects
of devotion, to the natural influence of her example. This
influence is great, and we cannot hold intimate, loving, and
reverent intercourse with the wise, the great, and the good,
without assimilating something to our own minds, hearts, and life.
Meditation on the humility, the maternity, the virginity, the
immaculate purity of the Virgin of virgins, Mother most pure,
Mother most chaste, Mother undefiled, cannot fail to give us
something of those virtues so characteristic of her, and of our
holy religion; but I do not believe that meditation on her virtues
could alone suffice to produce and sustain the effects I have
adduced, any more than the simple example of our Lord himself
could have sufficed to redeem the world, and elevate souls to
union with God. All the peculiarly Christian virtues are in the
order of regeneration, as is Christianity itself, though
presupposing, as does regeneration, the order of generation, and
therefore are impossible without grace or supernatural assistance.
Pelagianism, even Semi-Pelagianism, is a heresy, and little would
devotion to Mary in reality effect, if we were to leave out all
consideration of the supernatural assistance which she obtains for
her clients, by her all-powerful intercession with her divine Son.
Even faith alone in the mysteries and teachings of the Gospel
could not suffice; for the devils believe and tremble, and yet are
none the less devils. Most of us know and believe much better than
we do. We see, and approve the better, and follow the worse:
Video meliora proboque Deteriora sequor.
What we most need is not amply instruction or precept, but
strength. We are weak, and our appetites, passions, propensities,
are too strong for us, and enslave us. We feel ourselves sinking;
the waves are closing over us, and in fear and agony we cry out:
"Lord, save us, we perish!" "Holy Mother of God pray for us, or we
are lost!" The soul oppressed with a deep sense of its weakness,
of its inability to conquer by its own strength in the battle of
life, calls out for supernatural aid, and it is precisely this
aid, so much needed, and which enables us to resist and overcome
our enemies, that I dare believe, and avow that I believe, the
blessed Mary can and does obtain for those who fly to her
protection. There is no superstition in so believing. We do not
ask Mary to grant nor do we believe that she can grant us
supernatural aid. She is a creature and has no supernatural aid to
give. She grants us her prayers, her intercessions, and these she
can grant, for so much we can do for one another. The supernatural
assistance is granted by God himself, and is the immediate act of
the Holy Ghost, the Comforter, the Sanctifier, the Consummator,
done at her intercession, which is all-powerful, as we have seen,
because it is always in strict accord with the will and pleasure
of her divine Son.
No doubt God could grant us the supernatural assistance we need,
without the intercession of holy Mary, but as he is a God who
heareth and answereth prayer, it is his will that they who need
should ask, should pray; and prayer itself is a favor, and is a
necessary preparation for the reception of other favors. God uses
the ministry of saints and angels in the works of providence and
grace because he would honor them and give them a part in his
glory, and there can be none that he more delights to honor than
his mother, for there are none whose virtues do or can surpass
hers. She is his mother; she is more, for she hears the word of
God, and keeps it; she doeth always the will of God. Whom, then,
shall he honor, and make the channel of his graces, if not her?
Much is heard of the enthusiasm and extravagance of Italians in
their devotion to Mary. and we are gravely told by men who command
our reverence by their learning, ability, and virtues, that they
will not suit the taste of sober and undemonstrative Englishmen
and their descendants, the Americans. I know not whether it be so
or not; but faith is faith, and the experience of ages, of
generation after generation of Catholics, proves that never have
men in simplicity and love sought her protection in vain, and the
belief in her ability and willingness to protect and assist us in
our dangers and necessities by her all-availing prayers and
intercession, is an integral and essential part of that very
devotion which we render her, and which is her due.
Including the supernatural assistance Mary obtains for us by her
prayers and intercession for us, it would be difficult to
exaggerate the individual, domestic, and social influence of
Catholic devotion to the blessed Mary, the holy mother of God. I
believe not, nor am I required to believe, every legend that
floats about among the faithful, nor would I rashly deny them;
forms of devotion and expression may sometimes be adopted which I
do not find edifying to me, but if they exceed not the limits of
faith I quarrel not with them, for they may be edifying to others,
and may be acceptable, for the simplicity and good-will with which
they are adopted, to our Lady herself. Pious affection is not
required to speak always with the precision and exactness of a
theological doctor, and where there is no exuberance there is
little life, or an unfertile soil. Love never measures its words,
for all words seem too weak for it, and seldom does it, if deep
and genuine, fail to express itself in demonstrations that seem
wild and extravagant, half-crazy, to those who love not. It is not
easy to love our Lady too much; and I have found it always easy to
distinguish those who really love her, and are really devoted to
her, by their purity of thought and expression, their gentleness
and sweetness of temper, and their amiable and obliging
disposition, from all others. Devotion to Mary marks itself on the
features and even in the complexion. We take note, as soon as we
see or hear them, that they have been with Mary. I speak of those
who are really her children, not of those light, frivolous,
volatile creatures, who practice, by fits and starts, certain
little coquettish devotions to Mary, but never reflect seriously,
for a single moment, on her virtues, on the solidity of her
character, or the dignity of the position she holds in the divine
economy of grace. Mary heard the words of the angel; she heard the
words, and saw the deeds of her divine Son, and she pondered them
in heart. She never fails to assist those who follow her example.
I have spoken of the influence of devotion to Mary in elevating
maternity and with it, womanhood. The nations are in need of this
influence still. Christendom is lapsing anew into heathenism, and
the abominations I have referred to as existing in heathen
nations, are reviving in nations that profess to be Christian, and
even to a lamentable extent in the bosom of nations that call
themselves Catholic. Faith has become weak, charity has given way
to a watery philanthropy, and the worship of Mary is branded as
idolatry or as besottish superstition. Every thing is Profaned,
the church, the state, God, man, and woman; and society, while
boasting of its progress, seems to be rapidly lapsing into
barbarism. Never did the nations more need the church, or the
pastoral authority of the vicar of Christ; never was there a
greater need of the prayers and intercession of her whom we invoke
as Health of the Weak, Refuge of Sinners, Comforter of the
Afflicted, and Help of Christians. No small part of the world,
once Christian, and adoring the Cross, needs converting anew. The
crescent profanes the sacred dome of Saint Sophia, and more than
two-thirds of the population of the globe are infidels or pagans;
while heresy, schism, incredulity, indifferentism, dishonor Christ
and our Lady in fair lands that still retain the Christian name.
The work of converting and purifying the world is not finished,
and is apparently, to a great extent, to be done over again.
If there is any truth in the view I have presented of the moral
and social influence of devotion to the virgin-mother of God, it
is to that devotion, as a powerful means of reconverting and
repurifying Christian nations, and of converting and purifying
heathen nations, that we must have recourse. The enemy of man to
be overcome, is the same old enemy of God. Man would be God, not
in God's way, but in his own; he would stand on himself, and
suffice for himself. In the pride of his strength, and the light
of his own intellect, he refuses to bend to the Highest, and to
learn of the Wisest, and his strength turns to weakness, his light
to darkness, and his manhood disappears. He loses heart, and
likens himself to a worm, and crouches, and grovels. What can
restore him? Not to-day need we fear an excess of faith, an excess
of devotion. The enemy is a cold, freezing rationalism, which,
pretending to be reason, becomes lifeless materialism. Nothing can
overcome him but devotion to her who, as the mother of God, was to
crush the serpent's head. We must call on Mary to call on God with
us, and for us, to help us as he did the first Christians.
In conclusion, I will say that efforts to increase devotion to the
Blessed Virgin are, to me, among the most encouraging signs that
God has not forgotten us; that there are still faith and love on
the earth, and that there is still a recuperative principle in
Christian society. I thank God, for society itself, that there are
still those who delight to call themselves children of Mary, and
to keep alive in our cold, heartless world, the memory of her
virtues. While she is loved and reverenced there is hope for
society, and most grateful am I to God that the hard reasonings of
this reasonless age, and the chilling sneers of the proud, the
conceited, the worldly, the corrupt, have not frightened all out
of their deep, ardent, and simple devotion to her who is blessed
among women. If I have not been able to speak fit words in honor
of our Lady, as I fear I have not, let me at least avow that I
honor and cherish, in my heart of hearts, an who honor her, and
show their devotion to her, by imitating her virtues. They are the
real philanthropists they are tile real moral, the true social
reformers, and are doing more for society, for the progress of
virtue, intelligence, wisdom, than all our statesmen and
philosophers put together. They love and honor God, in loving and
honoring his mother, and I love and honor them, and, all unworthy
as I am, I pray them to have the charity to implore her to bestow
on me a mother's blessing, and to obtain for me the grace, when my
life's pilgrimage is ended, to behold the face of her divine Son,
my Lord, and my God.
Works, Vol. VIII, pp. 86-104 |