Beware of the Liturgi-cops
From a letter to the Editor of
The Catholic Times (Saginaw, Michigan) from Father Steve Gavit, Pastor of
St. Mary of the Assumption parish in Bay City.
They can get sneaky with their tactics as well. Wanting to know what is in the Eucharistic bread, they will call up the right person for the recipe, claiming they are thinking of using it in their parish. The recipe is gotten and a house meeting is arranged with other liturgi-cops. The recipe is scrutinized and--oh my gosh--they discover it has honey in it; really, really busted! The smile widens on their faces as their evidence mounts. They compile their notes and send off a letter to the bishop claiming this parish is breaking all sorts of liturgical rules and norms.
Diana at
St. Fiacre's Garden says she knows of a Liturgi-crime-scene.
One parish that I know of was using little cubes of bread for the Host, made of so many ingredients it was deemed invalid matter.
It wasn't her parish, so in Father Gavit's mind I suppose that makes her a Liturgi-cop, but Father Gavit's got me wondering.
Would it be "sneaky" for the Liturgy Committee to change to a new recipe for the Eucharistic bread without disclosing that it might be invalid matter? Would it be "sneaky" if they asked the Parish Council to back them in the subsequent controversy without disclosing this problem? Would it be "sneaky" for the members of the bread ministry to successfully pressure the pastor to stick with the new recipe despite years of parishioner complaints, when they know of the undisclosed problem? Would it be "sneaky" for the pastor to quietly go along with all this?
Just asking, since that's what happened at the parish Diana refers to, my parish of
St. Al's. The Euchroutons themselves were sometimes rather tasty, reminding me of
Roman Meal Bread; the Euchrouton experience left a bad taste in my mouth.
(via
Christifidelis)