The Provincial Emails
Friday, September 30, 2005
  Catholic institutions must follow archdiocese's guidelines
Wishful thinking? No, this September 22, 2005 Catholic Herald article (not available online) is about Procedures for Catholic Institutions in the Archdiocese of Milwaukee for Major Renovation and/or Building Construction [PDF 21 pages].


On the twentieth page, under procedures, we find that

4. All bids shall adhere to the prevailing wage standard for that area, as determined by the Wisconsin Statutes, Section 66.293, (applicable to all contracting done by Wisconsin municipalities).

This statute looks to be the state equivalent to the Davis-Bacon Act, in effect requiring that union scale be paid on such projects.


Is the Archdiocese generally equating union scale or prevailing wages and just wages. Not really. In the minutes of the local priests' union's February 25, 2004 meeting we find that the Archdiocese had been using an outside consulting firm in determining annual raises in priests' salaries. The minutes seem to say that, for the first time, the consultant's recommendation was not followed. Raises will be 2.5%, rather than the 5% it recommended, and the consultant has been terminated. The Archbishop decided on smaller raises so they would be more in line with raises being given to lay staff.

[Fr.] Ken Mich said this was not an issue about the Archbishop's authority, but rather concern over the system that was put in place to bring us up to parity with people with comparable responsibilities and positions.

So we have the oddity that the Archdiocese might someday pay priests on the same basis that it now compels parishes to pay construction contractors' employees, but only because the priests raised a stink about it. Otherwise, the Archdiocese seemed to think the priests ought to bear part of the burden of the financial squeeze.


At the parish level, the goal, set by the Archdiocese as I understand it, is to get employee pay up to 80% of comparable wages. At St. Al's, last I saw, this was done by comparing to the local public sector equivalent. So far, the parish has never been able to get up to that 80% level. Despite that, I assume the cost of the recent building project included paying union scale. These provisions in the Procedures are presented as requirements of justice, but they turn out to be special interest legislation.

 
Comments:
For more on Davis-Bacon, see my informative blog.

No parish school will EVER meet the "80%" rule without bankrupting the parish.
 
Post a Comment





<< Home

suitable 

clip art

My Photo
Name: Terrence Berres
Location: Franklin, Wisconsin, United States
Archives
March 1990 / April 1990 / May 1990 / November 1990 / January 1991 / May 1991 / February 1992 / March 1992 / April 1992 / June 1992 / July 1992 / November 1992 / December 1992 / February 1993 / March 1993 / June 1993 / September 1993 / October 1993 / November 1993 / January 1994 / February 1994 / May 1994 / July 1994 / September 1994 / November 1994 / December 1994 / January 1995 / February 1995 / March 1995 / April 1995 / May 1995 / June 1995 / July 1995 / September 1995 / October 1995 / November 1995 / December 1995 / January 1996 / February 1996 / March 1996 / April 1996 / May 1996 / June 1996 / July 1996 / August 1996 / September 1996 / October 1996 / November 1996 / December 1996 / January 1997 / February 1997 / March 1997 / April 1997 / May 1997 / June 1997 / July 1997 / September 1997 / October 1997 / November 1997 / December 1997 / January 1998 / February 1998 / March 1998 / April 1998 / May 1998 / September 1998 / October 1998 / November 1998 / December 1998 / January 1999 / February 1999 / March 1999 / April 1999 / July 1999 / August 1999 / September 1999 / October 1999 / November 1999 / December 1999 / January 2000 / February 2000 / March 2000 / April 2000 / May 2000 / June 2000 / July 2000 / February 2001 / March 2001 / April 2001 / May 2001 / June 2001 / July 2001 / October 2001 / December 2001 / January 2002 / February 2002 / March 2002 / April 2002 / May 2002 / June 2002 / July 2002 / August 2002 / September 2002 / October 2002 / November 2002 / December 2002 / January 2003 / February 2003 / March 2003 / April 2003 / May 2003 / June 2003 / July 2003 / August 2003 / September 2003 / October 2003 / November 2003 / December 2003 / January 2004 / February 2004 / March 2004 / April 2004 / May 2004 / June 2004 / July 2004 / August 2004 / September 2004 / October 2004 / November 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / February 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 /


Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]

Technorati search